Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

736 So. 2d 136

Hoagland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-06-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2000

1 state decisions

Relies on 717 So. 2d 95 - Spencer v. State · 722 So. 2d 250 - Boston v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-06-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion pursuant to Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. However, we reverse that part of the order barring appellant from filing any further pro se pleadings in this case and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinions in Boston v. State, 722 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), *137and Spencer v. State, 717 So.2d 95 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

¶2AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part.

BOOTH, MINER AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.
/736/so2d/136 · .json · Public domain