¶1Because the plaintiffs expert witness’ testimony created a conflict in the evidence, the trial court properly denied the defendants’ motions for directed verdict. See Lawrinson v. Bartruff, 600 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Further, as to the remaining points raised by the defendants, we find that they lack merit. As such, we affirm the final judgment under review.
¶2Affirmed.