736 So. 2d 273 - State v. Guillard’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably 775 So. 2d 1138 - State v. Henderson (2000), 845 So. 2d 358 - State v. Sylvia (2003)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · 660 So. 2d 1189 - State Ex Rel. Glover v. State · State v. Jacobs · 446 So. 2d 729 - State v. Prudholm
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he elements of knowledge and intent are states of mind and need not be proven as facts, but rather may be inferred from the circumstances.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“... [A] possible adjudication as a habitual offender is a separate proceeding that punishes one for his status as a recidivist, not for the most recent conviction. Since a multiple offender bill of information is not mandatory, but at the discretion of the prosecutor, the possibility that appellant may later be subject to sentence enhancement as a recidivist is speculative.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“guaranteed to the defendant by the Sixth Amendment. Strickland, supra at 686 , 104 S.Ct. at 2064 . Counsel's deficient performance will have prejudiced the defendant if he shows that the errors were so serious as to deprive him of a fair trial. To carry his burden, the defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.