736 So. 2d 296 - Whiddon v. Whiddon’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Diez v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. · 691 So. 2d 848 - Brannan v. Talbot · 655 So. 2d 546 - Burke v. Ledig · 682 So. 2d 932 - Fruge v. Fruge · 676 So. 2d 674 - Whiddon v. Whiddon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“paid, due, or owing prior to the filing of a disavowal action if an order of disavowal is subsequently obtained in such action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“for the sole purpose of determining the proper payor in child support cases”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“misrepresentation, fraud, or deception by the mother.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.