736 So. 2d 31 - McGoey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2019
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 252 So. 2d 1 - Gunn Plumbing, Inc. v. Dania Bank · Esch v. Forster · Smith v. Smith · Smith v. Smith · Arrington v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is clear to us ... that there was no meeting of the minds between the parties as to the nature or scope of this purported pretrial stipulation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`Where appropriately made, stipulations are binding not only upon the parties but also upon the trial and appellate courts.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]o avoid the consequences of a stipulation properly entered into, a party must show that the agreement is the product of a fraud, misrepresentation or mistake of fact. " Id. at 35 (emphasis added). The third district ultimately determined that there was confusion and no meeting of the minds as to the stipulation regarding the pretrial statements and reversed the conviction for a new trial. Similarly, from the record in this case it is apparent that there was no "meeting of the minds”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.