Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 So. 2d 425 - Belding v. Belding

736 So. 2d 425 - Belding v. Belding’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 437 So. 2d 1003 - Albright v. Albright · 652 So. 2d 1113 - Brooks v. Brooks · Sellers v. Sellers · 708 So. 2d 55 - Mizell v. Mizell · Smith v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A patient has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing (A) knowledge derived by the physician or psychotherapist by virtue of his professional relationship with the patient, or (B) confidential communications made for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment of his physical, alcohol or drug addiction, among himself, his physician or psychotherapist, and persons who are participating in the diagnosis or treatment under the direction of the physician or psychotherapist, including members of the patient's family.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he Supreme Court has acknowledged that `an increasing number of jurisdictions have, either by judicial decision or statute, created exceptions to the physician psychotherapist-patient privilege in child abuse and neglect cases, custody and termination of parental rights proceedings when the mental health of the parent could impact the welfare of the child.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]his Court does not reevaluate the evidence, retest the credibility of witnesses, nor otherwise act as a second fact finder. If there is substantial evidence in the record to support fact-findings, no matter what contrary evidence there may also be, we will uphold the chancellor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.