Little v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · 468 So. 2d 45 - Fuselier v. State · 599 So. 2d 951 - Ormond v. State · 506 So. 2d 254 - Boches v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Newly discovered evidence warrants a new trial if the evidence will probably produce a different result or verdict; further, the proponent must show that the evidence `has been discovered since the trial, that it could not have been discovered before the trial by the exercise of due diligence, that it is material to the issue, and that it is not merely cumulative, or impeaching.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.