Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 So. 2d 514 - Sullivan v. Stringer

736 So. 2d 514 - Sullivan v. Stringer’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 564 So. 2d 839 - Cumberland v. Cumberland · 431 So. 2d 1139 - Cheek v. Ricker · 480 So. 2d 1120 - Carr v. Carr · 681 So. 2d 97 - Cummings v. Benderman · 692 So. 2d 65 - Anderson v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The impact of these relationships, either by themselves or in conjunction with other factors, must rise to a level justifying a change in custody. The supreme court has made plain, despite the criminal nature of these acts, that cohabitation is relevant only to the extent it can be shown to affect the child adversely. Cheek v. Ricker, 431 So.2d 1139, 1144 (Miss.1983). In effect[,] the supreme court has indicated that the mores of modern society are such that moral conduct by a custodial parent is difficult to make a requirement in a divorce. Absent a finding of some conduct harmful in a more specific sense than the certain knowledge of sexual relations between unmarried adults, one of whom is the custodial parent, the court has held that custody cannot be withheld on that basis.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “What we are left with is that the existence of the relationship is insufficient, but if the relationship is coupled with other conduct that indicates the custodial parent's behavior is harmful in additional ways, custody can be changed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.