¶1specially concurring.
¶2I concur in the affirmation of the convictions. I also concur in the result as to the sentences because we are bound by Nelson v. State, 719 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (en banc).
736 So. 2d 62
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 2, 1999
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-06-02
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 2014
2 state decisions
Relies on 719 So. 2d 1230 - Nelson v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1999-06-02
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1specially concurring.
¶2I concur in the affirmation of the convictions. I also concur in the result as to the sentences because we are bound by Nelson v. State, 719 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (en banc).