736 So. 2d 72 - Matthews v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Steinhorst v. State · 471 So. 2d 32 - Tillman v. State · 703 So. 2d 444 - State v. Powell · 604 So. 2d 1265 - Steiner v. State · 411 So. 2d 1361 - Bentley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“once a defendant has enjoyed the benefits of probation without challenging the legality of [the] sentence, the defendant is thereafter precluded from an order revoking probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carson v. State“An appeal of an order revoking probation may review only proceedings after the order of probation.”); Matthews v. State, 736 So.2d 72, 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (en banc) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.