FLIGHT EXP., INC. v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2014
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 593 So. 2d 500 - McCain v. Florida Power Corporation · Fabre v. Marin · Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Company v. Pope · Cooper v. State · Brown v. Singletary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“failure to follow [rule 1.442] must be considered merely a harmless technical violation which did not affect the rights of the parties.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“A proposal may be made by or to any party or parties and by or to any combination of parties properly identified in the proposal. A joint proposal shall state the amount and terms attributable to each party.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“designed to obviate future conflicts as to the effect of an offer upon defendants-offerees.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.