Van Loan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 573 So. 2d 306 - State v. Smith · 579 So. 2d 80 - McKinney v. State · 579 So. 2d 734 - Armstrong v. State · 657 So. 2d 1198 - Blandon v. State · Roberts v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“affirmatively agree[ing] to the omission or the alteration of a jury instruction,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burns v. State · Caldwell v. State“A failure to give these instructions constitutes fundamental error. By omitting the definitions, the trial court fails to advise the jury as to what constitutes lawful acts versus unlawful acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burgess v. State“affirmatively agrees to the omission or the alteration of a jury instruction, ... counsel must be aware of the omission, alteration, or incomplete instruction and affirmatively agree to it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.