Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on West Virginia State Department of Tax & Revenue v. Internal Revenue Service · State of Arizona v. State of California · 642 So. 2d 730 - Armstrong v. State · Venuto v. State · 666 So. 2d 1059 - Long v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the witness's testimony will change to such an extent as to render probable a different verdict.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In this case, the trial court denied relief after reviewing the entire trial record and Sliwa's affidavit, but without hearing any evidence. After conducting the same review, we cannot conclude that Sliwa's affidavit was inherently incredible or that his trial testimony was obviously immaterial to the verdict, so as to allow the trial court to reject his recantation without holding an evidentiary hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“usually required to make that determination,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.