Lunde v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Torres v. State (2005), State v. Steelman (2002)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Beck v. State of Ohio · Henry v. United States · Armstrong v. State · Self v. State · Glass v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether at that moment the facts and circumstances within the officer’s knowledge and of which (he) had reasonably trustworthy information were sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the arrested person had committed or was committing an offense.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Simpson v. State · Rance v. State“(b) A peace officer may arrest an offender without a warrant for any offense committed in his presence or within his view.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Stull v. State · Kite v. State“Even though neither officer could testify as to overt observation of a substance or even packaging or money ... both Massey and Woods [the officers] were firm in their testimony that in their professional opinion, based on the particular circumstances and their knowledge of similar drug deals, that a transaction was taking place as they watched appellant. Lunde, 736 S.W.2d at 667-68 . [Citation omitted].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cardwell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.