Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 736 SW2D 700 - Ware v. State

Ware v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Harris v. State (1989), Garrett v. State (1988)

32 state decisions

1401987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Garza v. State · Thompson v. State · Ex Parte Calvin · Ware v. State · Warren v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “law of the case” doctrine. However, appellant's reliance on that doctrine is misplaced. The "law of the case” doctrine provides "that an appellate court's resolution of a question of law in a previous appeal of the same case will govern the disposition of the same issue when raised in a subsequent appeal”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hen the facts and legal issues in a case on appeal are virtually identical with those in a previous appeal in which the legal issues were resolved then logic and reason dictate that the appeals be viewed as the same case. (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The Taw of the case’ doctrine is as applicable to the appeals of criminal cases as it is to appeals of civil cases.” Ware v. State, 736 S.W.2d 700, 701 (Tex.Crim.App.1987).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.