State v. Claybrook’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2008
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Edwards v. Arizona · Sandstrom v. Montana · Oregon v. Bradshaw · State v. Melson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In every criminal ease the defendant is entitled to have his guilt or innocence determined by impartial and unbiased jurors who have not been subjected to the influence of inadmissible and prejudicial information such as knowledge that the defendant has been convicted or accused of other crimes, especially of crimes substantially similar to that for which he is standing trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Shepherd“The failure to afford to a defendant the phone call required by this statute is but one factor to be considered in determining the voluntariness of the defendant’s statement and whether the conduct of the officers has overcome the will of the accused. Automatic suppression of the statement is not called for.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Downey“The court, upon motion of a party or on its own motion, may direct that any portion of the questioning of a prospective juror be conducted out of the presence of the tentatively selected jurors and other prospective jurors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Price
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.