Stock Pot Restaurant, Inc. v. Stockpot, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
737 F.2d 1576 · 1984
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Coleman v. Dines (1985), Exxon Corporation v. Oxxford Clothes Inc Xx (1997)
16 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1127 (§ 45 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. · Mother's Restaurant Incorporated v. Mama's Pizza Inc · In Re Francis Jamc De Blauwe and Frank Ka Selleslags · International Order of Job's Daughters v. Lindeburg & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clearly or manifestly wrong or erroneous.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“there was no depreciation of the quality of the restaurant services rendered”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“accept[s] the [Board's] factual findings unless they are clearly wrong.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.