Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 737 F.2d 261 - Boudin v. Thomas

Boudin v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

737 F.2d 261 · 1984

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
June 1999
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Meachum v. Fano · Olim v. Wakinekona · Santoni v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “habeas is the appropriate action to challenge conditions of confinement where the prisoner seeks to be moved in order to remedy past constitutional violations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “also be available to challenge such prison conditions,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.