Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 737 F.2d 853 - United States v. Gamble

United States v. Gamble’s Empirical Analysis

737 F.2d 853 · 1984

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
3
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably United States v. Blevins (1992), United States v. Esch (1987)

55 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

3901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)

Relies on Rochin v. People of California · Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Pereira v. United States · United States v. Russell · Sorrells v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defense that the government's conduct was so outrageous as to require reversal on due process grounds is often raised but is almost never successful.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “due process principles would absolutely bar the government from invoking judicial processes to obtain a conviction.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]e have held that the government need not have a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing in order to conduct an undercover investigation of a particular person.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.