Dixon v. Houk’s Empirical Analysis
737 F.3d 1003 · 2013
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
March 2025
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Lockett v. Ohio · Cupp v. Naughten · Eddings v. Oklahoma
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.