Thomas v. United State’s Empirical Analysis
737 F.3d 1202 · 2013
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 851 (§ 411 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barker v. Wingo · Wainwright v. Sykes · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Jones v. Barnes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An evidentiary hearing may be denied ... if the motion, files, and records of the case conclusively show that the movant is not entitled to relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“trial counsel’s decision not to move to dismiss the indictment”); cf. Mayo v. Henderson, 13 F.3d 528 , 533 (2d Cir. 1994) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.