Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 737 F.3d 1209 - Hill v. Walker

Hill v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

737 F.3d 1209 · 2013

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 8 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 2601 (§ 2 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2611 (§ 101 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2615 (§ 105 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Mary J. Riordan v. William L. Kempiners and Shirley Randolph · Fenney v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad · Sprenger v. Federal Home Loan Bank · Darby v. Bratch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While Hill alleged that Walker had the authority to fire her, she did not plead that Walker controlled her compensation or made the decision not to pay her for accrued compensatory time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “decisions interpreting either the ADA or the Rehabilitation Act are applicable and interchangeable to claims under each statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to perform the essential functions of the position, with or without reasonable accommodation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.