United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
737 F.3d 522 · 2013
Citation profile
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from South Dakota District Court)
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Hyde v. United States · Hyde v. United States · United States v. Borelli · United States v. Puig-Infante · United States v. Boyd
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[N]either arrest nor incarceration automatically triggers withdrawal form a conspiracy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Incarceration alone does not constitute withdrawal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“from a conspiracy); United States v. Gonzalez , 940 F.2d 1413 , 1427 (11th Cir. 1991) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.