Smith v. Jem Group, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
737 F.3d 636 · 2013
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 2021
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Idaho District Court)
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 9 U.S.C. § 16 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna · At&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion · AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion · Nagrampa v. MailCoups, Inc. · 127 Wash. 2d 124 - Nelson v. McGoldrick
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.