Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 737 NE2D 383 - Hoskins v. State

Hoskins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lopez v. State · Edgecomb v. State · Griffin v. State · Carr v. State · Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to decline the tendered instruction. Hoskins, 737 N.E.2d at 385 . See also Jacobs v. State, 640 N.E.2d 61, 67 (Ind.Ct. App.1994), trans. denied (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'whether there was evidence to render the instruction applicable to the issues.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “whether the evidence supports giving the instruction”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.