In Re Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge Nowell · In Re Complaint Concerning Miera · In Re Complaint Concerning Judge McDonough · In Re Empson · In Re Complaint Concerning the Snyder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“But Rule 11(c) is silent as to whether the board may make findings of fact or conclusions of law that differ from those of the fact finding panel. [4] Nor does Rule 13(f), Rules of Board on Judicial Standards, prescribe the standard of review we are to adopt in judicial discipline cases, particularly when we are confronted with two differing sets of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Rule 13(f) requires us to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“family, social, political or other relationships to influence judicial conduct or judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“accept[], reject[] or modify[] in whole or in part, the recommendation of the board,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.