State v. Frampton’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 57 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably State v. Mohi (1995), State v. Bakalov (1999)
1 federal appellate · 57 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 15 U.S.C. § 1127 (§ 45 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Argersinger v. Hamlin · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a colloquy on the record between the court and the accused is the preferred method of ascertaining the validity of a waiver”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“'dangers and disadvantages of self-representation.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rohwedder · State v. Smith“(1) advise the defendant of his constitutional right to the assistance of counsel, as well as his constitutional right to represent himself; (2) ascertain that the defendant possesses the intelligence and capacity to understand and appreciate the consequences of the decision to represent himself, including the expectation that the defendant will comply with technical rules and the recognition that presenting a defense is not just a matter of telling one’s story; and (3) ascertain that the defendant comprehends the nature of the charges and proceedings, the range of permissible punishments, and any additional facts essential to a broad understanding of the case.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Watson · State v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.