Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 737 P.2d 199 - Penrod v. Carter

Penrod v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 1995
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Price-Orem Investment Co. v. Rollins, Brown & Gunnell, Inc. · Morgan v. Quailbrook Condominium Co. · Cerritos Trucking Co. v. Utah Venture No. 1 · Jensen v. Eakins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion for a directed verdict requires the trial court to consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom it is directed. The case should not be taken from the jury where there is substantial dispute in the evidence .... On appeal, this Court applies the same rules.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.