Anderson v. Rosebrook’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2021
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Western United Realty, Inc. v. Isaacs · 116 Wis. 2d 95 - Flambeau Products Corp. v. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. · Hudson v. American Founders Life Ins. Co. of Denver · Horn Waterproofing Corp. v. Bushwick Iron & Steel Co. · 25 Wash. App. 671 - Department of Fisheries v. J-Z Sales Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to constitute an accord and satisfaction, it is necessary that the money should be offered in full satisfaction of the demand, and be accompanied by such acts and declarations as amount to a condition that the money, if accepted, is accepted in satisfaction; and it must be such that the party to whom it is offered is bound to understand therefrom that, if he takes it, he takes it subject to such conditions.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“an obligee agrees to accept a stated performance in satisfaction of the obligor's existing duty, the performance of which discharges the original obligation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“willful retention of a security deposit in violation of this section shall render a landlord Hable for treble the amount of that portion of the security deposit wrongfully withheld from the tenant, together with reasonable attorney's fees and court costs ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mishkin v. Young
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.