Scales v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2018
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Allen v. United States · Sullivan v. United States · Hill v. State · White v. State · Young v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a witness, after making an in-court identification of the defendant, may testify that `at a particular day, place, and time or times, [he or she] had occasion to see, recognize and identify the defendant as the person who committed the crime.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ochoa v. State“testimony of a victim concerning a pre-trial identification is not only material, but most competent for corroboration.” Id. (citing Hill v. State, 500 P.2d 1075 (Okl.Cr.1972)). Such pre-trial identification evidence may also be admitted”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nickell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.