Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 737 P.2d 995 - State v. Underwood

State v. Underwood’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1988
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Booker · State v. McCardell · State v. McClain · State v. Buel · State v. Loe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing a defendant's conviction, we do not substitute our judgment for that of the jury. State v. Booker, 709 P.2d 342, 345 (Utah 1985). It is the exclusive function of the jury to weigh the evidence and to determine the credibility of the witnesses. Id. ... . When there is any evidence, including reasonable inferences that can be drawn from it, from which findings of all the requisite elements of the crime can be reasonably made, our inquiry stops and we sustain the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.