737 So. 2d 222 - State v. Patterson’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1999
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 630 So. 2d 1284 - State v. Rome · 439 So. 2d 410 - State v. Taylor · State v. Roche · 704 So. 2d 380 - State v. Mattox · Fink v. Terrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a defendant files a motion to quash or other preliminary plea, the running of the periods of limitation established by article 578 shall be suspended until the ruling of the court thereon; but in no cause shall the state have less than one year after the ruling to commence the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sartain“Except as otherwise provided [97- 2861 La.App. 4 Cir. 5] in this Chapter, no trial shall be commenced: ... (2) in [non-capital] felony cases after two years from the date of institution of the prosecution”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sartain“... the defendant fails to appear at any proceeding pursuant to actual notice, proof of which appears of record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sartain
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.