Spivey v. State

Floyd SPIVEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 15, 1999.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-07-15

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1999

3 state decisions

Relies on 714 So. 2d 429 - State v. Mancino · Williamson v. Williamson · Pennington v. Caggiano

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-07-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1No brief filed, for Appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We affirm the denial of Spivey's motion to correct jail time credit, without prejudice to Spivey's ability to file a properly pled rule 3.800(a) motion in the trial court. State v. Mancino,714 So.2d 429, 433 (Fla. 1998) ("[C]redit time issues are cognizable in a rule 3.800 motion when it is affirmatively alleged that the court records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief."); Combs v. State,723 So.2d 931 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Baker v. State,714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

¶5AFFIRMED.

¶6MINER, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.