Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

737 So. 2d 615

Bell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-07-22

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2006

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-07-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the order finding that appellant violated his probation. Because appellant received a split sentence totaling the maximum time available for the underlying second degree felony, the sentence must be corrected to show that appellant is entitled to credit for time spent on probation, as well as credit for time spent in jail awaiting sentencing for the violation of probation.

¶2AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

BARFIELD, C.J. and KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.
/737/so2d/615 · .json · Public domain