Moore v. Zant

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 23, 1984.

2 counsel of record

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Hensley v. Eckerhart

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-07-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Thurman v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc. (1996), 41 Fair Emplpraccas 358 27 Wage & Hour Cas

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Robert E. Morin, Stephen B. Bright, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.

Susan Boleyn, William B. Hill, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Case below: 722 F.2d 640.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

¶1

The court en banc holds this case in abeyance for a period of 60 days in order that petitioner may present to the courts of the State of Georgia claims he may have arising out of Stynchcombe v. Floyd, 252 Ga. 113, 311 S.E.2d 828 (1984).