Lake Communications, Inc. v. ICC Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
738 F.2d 1473 · 1984
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2019 · most notably Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc (1985), Fisher IV v. Ag Becker Paribas Incorporation a (1986)
18 federal appellate · 4 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 13 (§ 2 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 9 U.S.C. § 2 · 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Montana v. United States · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · Wilko v. Swan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“More is required than action inconsistent with an arbitration provision; prejudice to the party opposing arbitration must also be shown.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“as an interlocutory order granting an injunction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.