Ray E. Friedman & Co. v. Jenkins’s Empirical Analysis
738 F.2d 251 · 1984
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 7 U.S.C. § 6B
Relies on Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston · Haltmier v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission · Strong v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours Co. · 341 F. Supp. 764 - Johnson v. Barthur Espey, Shearson, Hammill & Co. · Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Brooks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]ince the account was non-discretionary and controlled by [the customer], there is likewise no merit in his contention that an instruction on fiduciary duty should have been given.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.