Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 738 F.2d 323 - Hulm First Federal Savings Loan Association of Bismarck Inc v. Hulm First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Bismarck Inc

Hulm First Federal Savings Loan Association of Bismarck Inc v. Hulm First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Bismarck Inc’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
August 2004
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently August 2004 · most notably United States v. Rawle (1988), Bundles v. Baker (1988)

2 federal appellate · 8 district ·

570198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Butner v. United States · McKenzie v. Irving Trust Co. · Johnson v. First National Bank · Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo · Champlin Petroleum Co. v. King & King Enterprises

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The trustee may avoid any transfer of an interest of the debtor in property, or any obligation incurred by the debtor, that was made or incurred on or within one year before the date of the filing of the petition, if the debtor— (2)(A) received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for such transfer or obligation; and (B)(i) was insolvent on the date that such transfer was made or such obligation was incurred, or became insolvent as a result of such transfer or obligation; (ii) was engaged in business, or was about to engage in business or a transaction, for which any property remaining with the debtor was an unreasonably small capital; or (iii) intended to incur, or believed that the debtor would incur debts that would be beyond the debtor’s ability to pay as such debts matured.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In our view, the question of whether the sale price provided a reasonably equivalent value cannot be answered without an evidentiary hearing.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “... every mode ... voluntary or involuntary, of disposing of or parting with property ...””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.