Barajas v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis
738 F.2d 641 · 1984
Citation profile
22 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently October 2006 · most notably Johnson v. Bowen (1988), Stone v. Heckler (1985)
22 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on DePaepe v. Richardson · Smith v. Schweiker · Jones v. Heckler · Laffoon v. Califano · Chico v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The opinions, diagnosis, and medical evidence of a treating physician whose familiarities with the patient's injuries, treatment, and responses over a length of time, should be accorded considerable weight.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Abshire v. Bowen“non-severe impairment” as one that does not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davis v. Heckler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.