Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 738 F.2d 879 - Guenther v. Holmgreen

Guenther v. Holmgreen’s Empirical Analysis

738 F.2d 879 · 1984

Citation profile

125
cited by 125 later decisions
6
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 125 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Bell v. City of Milwaukee (1984), Groman v. Township of Manalapan (1995)

55 federal appellate · 4 district · 9 state decisions

6501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Franks v. Delaware · Simmons v. United States · Parratt v. Taylor · Monroe v. Pape

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 125 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he issue sought to be precluded must be the same as that involved in the prior judicial proceeding; the issue was litigated in the prior action; the issue was in fact actually determined in the prior proceeding; and the determination of that issue was necessary to support the judgment in the prior proceeding.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “might have [given rise to] a cognizable Sec. 1983 cause of action for injuries suffered as a result of the illegal, unconstitutional arrest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a victim of a property or liberty deprivation who has recourse to an adequate state remedy has not been denied 'due process of law”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.