Knapp v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis
738 F.3d 1106 · 2013
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc. · Andrews v. King · United States Garst v. Lockheed-Martin Corporation · Rodriguez v. Cook
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the dismissing court's action and the reasons underlying it .... [T]he procedural mechanism or Rule by which the dismissal is accomplished, while informative, is not dispositive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. Harris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.