Diversey v. Schmidly’s Empirical Analysis
738 F.3d 1196 · 2013
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Colorado District Court)
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 106 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 107 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 501 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 507 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises · Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios Inc · Hall v. Bellmon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“knowledge of a violation or is chargeable with such knowledge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“within three years after the claim accrued.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.