Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 738 F.3d 338 - United States v. Eiland

United States v. Eiland’s Empirical Analysis

738 F.3d 338 · 2013

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Olano · Illinois v. Gates · Franks v. Delaware · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · Morris v. Slappy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was convicted of narcotics conspiracy (Count 1) with regard to heroin, cocaine, and cocaine base, but not with regard to PCP; RICO conspiracy (Count 2); CCE (Count 3); attempt to possess with intent to distribute heroin (Count 5); and three counts of unlawful use of a communication facility. The jury found Miller not guilty of attempt to possess with intent to distribute PCP and five additional communications counts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Before the government will agree to the plea agreement ... we're going to know the information they're providing is correct or we're going to go out and conduct further investigation to determine what they have been telling us is correct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(a) the means by which the drugs were obtained; (b) the manner and timetable of shipments; (c) the locations where drugs and illegally obtained assets were hidden; or (d) the manner in which the defendants concealed their activities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.