United States v. Mathis’s Empirical Analysis
738 F.3d 719 · 2013
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Michigan Eastern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1519 (§ 802 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Katz v. United States · Texas v. Brown · Horton v. California · See v. City of Seattle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consisting of a partially demolished building and debris strewn throughout a paved lot” was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the area searched or items seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.