Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 738 F.3d 861 - Adams v. Adams

Adams v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

738 F.3d 861 · 2013

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
February 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 158 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738

Relies on Grogan v. Garner · Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp. · Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers · Heiser v. Woodruff · Waldroup v. Greene County Hospital Authority

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even if the bankruptcy court’s equitable powers are great, there are limits to that authority. One of them is 28 U.S.C. § 1738 , the statutory clause requiring that state court judgments be given full faith and credit in federal courts as they would in the state that issued them. Thus, the bankruptcy court was required to find that the Bulks owed Ivan Bulic the amount entered in the state court judgment, since Indiana courts would find that judgment preclusive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.