Narisma v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 101 (Agent Orange Act of 1991) · 38 U.S.C. § 107 · 38 U.S.C. § 1501 · 38 U.S.C. § 1801
Relies on Johnson v. Robison · Royster Guano Co v. Commonwealth of Virginia · United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez · Califano v. Gautier Torres a Califano · Harris v. Rosario
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in the occupation of Japan and of lands now or formerly subject to Japan, and elsewhere in the Far East.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.