Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 738 N.E.2d 337 - Biehl v. State

Biehl v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barany v. State · Widener v. State · 146 Ind. App. 404 - Beaman v. Hedrick · Edgecomb v. State · Carter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The reviewing court will not revise a sentence authorized by statute except where such sentence is manifestly unreasonable in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the offender.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The statute appropriately encourages leniency toward defendants who have not previously been through the criminal justice system.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.