Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 738 P2D 20 - People v. Hunter

People v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2012

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

701987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Mascarenas · People v. Salvador · People v. Knaub · 267 F. Supp. 433 - Hutchison v. Patterson · Martinez v. Kirbens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he five year term of probation was within the maximum authorized sentence, the effective maximum authorized sentence was five years — four years in actual confinement plus one year [of parole].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The fact that a person has been released on parole in no way alters the fact that he is still under sentence; he is in legal custody, although that custody consists only of supervision. Also § 17-2-207, C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 8A) provides that an offender on parole remains under the legal custody of the Department of Corrections and may be subject at any time to be returned to a correctional facility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “special privilege to be outside the walls of the institution while serving his sentence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.