Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 738 P2D 559 - Bechtel v. State

Bechtel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably Williams v. State (2001), Conoyer v. State (1997)

28 state decisions

12019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Young · Randolph v. Collectramatic, Inc. · Stout v. State · Tobler v. State · Chandler v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court has held that where there is no error present, there can be no accumulation of error. However, when there have been numerous irregularities during the course of the trial that tend to prejudice the rights of the defendant, reversal will be required if the cumulative effect of all the errors was to deny the defendant a fair trial.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “personal belief or opinion as to the truth or falsity of any testimony,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(Tr. III 869) Such discourteous, disrespectful, and disgraceful conduct on the part of District Attorney Suttle is degrading to our system of justice and is totally inexcusable. Such behavior is in derogation of the Oklahoma Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 7-106(C)(6), which provides that an attorney shall not engage”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.