738 So. 2d 221 - Beyer v. Easterling’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 444 So. 2d 358 - Brown v. Credit Center, Inc. · 689 So. 2d 770 - Bredemeier v. Jackson · 669 So. 2d 56 - Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Berry · Bocanegra v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. · PMZ Oil Co. v. Lucroy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Clearly, testimony given in a prior action does not estop the witness from testifying to the contrary in a subsequent action against one not a party to the prior action, where the former testimony was given by mistake or inadvertence or without full knowledge of the facts and is so explained by the witness in a subsequent action. In other words, the oath, to be binding as an estoppel, must be willfully false, or must have the effect of misleading the other party to his injury....28 Am.Jur.2d Estoppel and Waiver §§ 71, at 702 (1996)(footnotes omitted).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.